HEOR Studies: Proving Value and Winning Market Access
As healthcare systems face growing pressure to allocate limited resources, payers are demanding...
Rare diseases create unique complexities for patient access, which translate directly to unique imperatives for pharmaceutical marketing. When executed effectively, rare disease marketing connects healthcare providers and patients with the information and support they need to pursue appropriate treatment.
In this article, we highlight key challenges for growing rare disease therapies and explore how the right market access strategy can build successful brands while helping patients find and access the treatment they need (in some cases, even for a condition they don’t yet know they have).
Rare diseases refer to conditions with comparatively small patient populations. In the United States, the Orphan Drug Act (ODA) defines rare diseases as those impacting fewer than 200,000 people within the country, or diseases that affect more than 200,000 in the United States and for which there is no reasonable expectation that R&D costs could be recovered from sales.
While the populations for a given rare disease condition may be comparatively small, these conditions collectively exert a major impact on the healthcare system. According to the FDA, over 7,000 rare diseases affect more than 30 million people in the United States.
Developing therapies for these conditions represents a systemic challenge. Phrma.org reports that less than 10% of known rare diseases have an approved treatment available. Because it can be challenging for pharmaceutical companies to recoup their costs on R&D for rare disease therapies, the ODA provides incentives to invest in rare disease research. The ODA offers several forms of support, including both a 25% research tax credit and a seven-year market exclusivity period for approved therapies (meaning the FDA cannot approve the same drug for the same orphan indication during that time). This protection improves the likelihood that companies can recover their investment, helping de-risk the high costs and uncertainties involved in rare disease treatment R&D.
These incentives play a critical role in encouraging development. According to research published in the Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, orphan designations have resulted in the development of treatments for nearly 400 rare diseases since the ODA’s passage in 1983 (compared to an average of only two per year prior to passage of the legislation).
Still, even when a therapy reaches the market, commercialization can create unique hurdles. One of the most persistent is the general lack of awareness (among both clinicians and the public) about these conditions and the therapies available to treat them. That’s why raising awareness is not just a marketing priority, but a critical foundation for helping patients access appropriate care. Effective rare disease marketing strategies must overcome knowledge gaps, activate rare patient and HCP communities, and support more timely and accurate diagnosis.
It is important to note that regulatory definitions and protections vary by region. In the U.S., a drug may receive orphan designation for a specific rare indication, even if it is also approved for other, more common uses. In contrast, the European Union takes an all-or-nothing approach; if a product later gains approval for a non-rare indication, it forfeits orphan status altogether. This distinction carries important implications for global launch strategy and lifecycle planning.
The same core principle underpins each of the strategies outlined below: successful rare disease launches are built on a patient-first mindset. Understanding the unique challenges faced by people living with rare conditions is essential. From early development through post-launch, this perspective will help map the patient journey to shape a truly impactful launch.
In rare disease marketing, patient advocacy groups are essential partners in education, outreach, and access enablement. Most advocacy organizations are built around a shared mission to inform and empower patients, making them a natural fit for digital engagement strategies.
Proactively collaborating with these groups is a great launch pad for pharmaceutical companies to build trust and credibility within tight-knit patient communities. Whether through co-developed educational content, social media campaigns, or patient ambassador programs, advocacy groups offer a direct line to the people who matter most. Their insights go beyond clinical needs, helping brands understand the lived experience of rare diseases and respond with empathetic messaging.
True patient centricity starts with listening. Advocacy groups are often the first to identify information gaps between patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers. When companies engage these organizations early and often, they gain critical perspectives that can shape not only messaging but also care pathways and access programs.
In rare disease treatment, prior authorization (PA) is often a major barrier to timely patient access. While payer policies may outline requirements on paper, the real-world authorization process is where access can stall through paperwork delays, unclear documentation standards, or poorly articulated clinical justification.
Manufacturers need to go beyond reviewing payer criteria and actively map the patient authorization process to identify friction points. This process should not only reveal specific friction points but also set the tone for critical communication between prescribers and the manufacturer’s medical team.
To reduce these delays, pharmaceutical marketers should provide tools and support that simplify the PA process for healthcare providers. Resources like checklists and sample documentation can make it easier for physicians’ offices to navigate requirements and secure approvals, ultimately helping patients begin treatment faster.
Effective coordination between healthcare providers and payers is essential to unlock access to rare disease therapies, and manufacturers play a key role in enabling that connection. In many cases, a well-structured HUB program will become a critical touchpoint, serving as a central source of truth for stakeholders across the care journey.
For rare and high-cost therapies, success often depends on clinical-level dialogue, not just administrative processes, and payer decisions frequently involve senior medical leadership. That makes it crucial for pharmaceutical manufacturers to prioritize engagement between their chief medical officer and the payer’s clinical review team, rather than relying solely on pharmacy benefit managers.
Healthcare professionals are often the first (and sometimes only) point of contact for rare disease patients seeking answers. That makes provider education a cornerstone of any effective rare disease marketing strategy.
Collaborating with key opinion leaders (KOLs) and subject matter experts enables pharmaceutical companies to deliver credible, targeted education that raises awareness not only about specific therapies but also about the rare conditions themselves. These partnerships help build trust with providers while creating space for shared learning by unveiling insights about disease management, care gaps, and patient needs that can inform broader strategy.
Educational content should go beyond product details. Materials that cover disease epidemiology, progression, and treatment pathways help HCPs more confidently identify rare conditions and guide patients toward appropriate care.
Data strategy and access strategy are inseparable in the rare disease market. With limited patient populations and sparse precedent, the right evidence is vital to building an effective narrative.
In practice, this means preparing for health technology assessments (HTAs) well in advance. Manufacturers should begin laying the groundwork during Phase III or even earlier to ensure that data collection aligns with payer expectations. Incorporating patient-centered endpoints, including quality-of-life metrics, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and broader Health Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR), can help anticipate the questions that regulators and payers will ask.
Navigating the complexities of rare disease commercialization requires a strategic partner with deep expertise in market access, patient engagement, and healthcare provider education. At TJP, we specialize in developing tailored strategies that address the unique challenges of rare disease markets.
Talk to one of our experts to explore how we can support your product's journey from development to successful launch.
For rare and high-cost therapies, payers often escalate decisions to clinical leadership, so peer-to-peer dialogue between medical officers is key to overcoming approval hurdles.
Checklists, prior auth templates, HUB support, and real-time payer guidance can reduce administrative friction and delays.
At least six months before BLA filing (earlier if possible) to allow for education, access planning, and data readiness.
Randy McGonigal, MBA
Randy brings more than 25 years of market access experience across several complex therapeutic categories. He has experience in leading market access teams with large and small pharmaceutical companies. Randy is experienced in creating and implementing strategies which drive access for patients. Additionally, has authored HEOR publications under ISPOR guidelines to add payer value for rare and orphan medications.